THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/02
BUDGET
PERFORMANCE
APRIL
– JUNE 2002
BUDGET PERFORMANCE
APRIL – JUNE 2002
1.
Overall
budgetary execution for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2001/02 spanning April
– June 2002 remained closely in line with budget estimates. Strong revenue
collection coupled with lower than planned expenditure resulted in a favourable
government financial position, despite lower than projected external inflows.
Details of fiscal performance for the fourth quarter and for the entire fiscal
year are presented in Annex A.
2.
Revenue
collection for the quarter April – June 2002 was Tsh. 279 billion compared to
estimate of Tsh. 271 billion. On cumulative basis, total revenue collection for
the fiscal year was Tsh. 1,043 billion compared to estimate of Tsh. 1,025
billion. This over performance of 2 percent is attributable to higher
collection on income taxes and VAT on domestic sales. Higher than projected
collections from parastatal dividends specifically from the Bank of Tanzania also
contributed to the strong revenue performance in 2001/02. Cumulative revenue
collection in 2001/02 is 12 percent higher than the corresponding collections
in the 2000/01 fiscal year. This implies a real revenue growth of 7 percent
considering an average inflation rate of 5 percent in 2001/02.
3.
Total
expenditure for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year was Tsh. 412 billion, 6
percent above estimates of Tsh 390 billion, representing a catch up in
expenditures from lower than estimated spending in the first half of the fiscal
year. However, cumulative expenditure for the fiscal year was Tsh. 1,463 billion,
9 percent below estimate of Tsh. 1,569 billion.
4.
The
lower than planned expenditures in the fiscal year was due mainly to i) shortfall
in foreign budget support loans and grant and ii) delays in government
procurement of goods and services, on account of limited capacity and
experience in applying the new Public Procurement Act 2001. Notwithstanding the
shortfall in budget support loans and grants, priority sectors received their
full fourth quarter allocations (April - March 2002), as per respective
cash-flow requirements. In addition, the preparations of the population census,
and HIV/AIDS priority interventions through the Tanzania Commission on AIDS
(TACAIDS) were fully funded.
5.
During
the fiscal year July 2001 – June 2002, the financing position of the government
improved with both domestic and foreign creditors. Net domestic financing for
the period under consideration was an increase of deposits to the tune of Tsh. 23
billion. This compared favourably with estimates of Tsh. 34 billion borrowing.
This was mainly on account of slower execution of expenditures, lower debt
service on account of the HIPC Completion Point. However, this favourable
financial position end-June 2002 does not take into account the expenditure float
i.e. cheques written in 2001/02 that were not presented at the central bank by
end June 2002 as well as commitments outstanding at end-June 2002, for which
cheques would need to be written in 2002/03. Net foreign financing for the fiscal
year was Tsh. 118 billion approximately in line with the projected figure of
Tsh. 110 billion.
6.
Figure
1 summarises the fiscal performance for the entire financial year, while figure
2 presents the fiscal performance for the fourth quarter April – June 2002.
Performance is compared with estimates and with figures for the same period
last year.
Figure 1

Figure 2

REVENUE BY SOURCE
7.
Revenue
collection for the quarter April - June 2002 remained 3 percent over the
estimates, in line with the July 2001 - March 2002 quarterly revenue collection
performance. Cumulative revenue collection for the fiscal year was Tsh. 1,043
billion compared to budget estimates of Tsh. 1,025 billion, representing an
over performance of 2 percent. On a year-on-year basis revenue collection in
2001/02 was 12 percent higher than the revenue collection in 2000/01 implying a
real increase in revenues of 7 percent as average inflation rate in 2001/02 was
5 percent. Figure 3 presents revenue performance by source against estimates
along with comparative revenue performance over the same period last year. Annex
B presents details of revenue collection for 2001/02 along with a year-on-year
comparison with 2000/01.
Figure 3

Year on Year Performance
8.
Total
revenue collection as explained above was 12 percent higher than the same
period last year. Table 1 shows the revenue items with the largest year-on-year
changes. For the fiscal year, the most significant over-performers remained
withholding taxes (Tsh. 21 billion), PAYE (Tsh. 16 billion), domestic VAT (Tsh.
12 billion) and parastatal dividends (Tsh. 5 billion). The most significant
shortfalls occurred in VAT on imports of non-petroleum goods (shortfall Tsh. 40
billion). The shortfall on VAT on imports is principally on account of the over
estimation of VAT collection from government purchases of vatable goods, in
view of the withdrawal of VAT exemption for government from July 2001. In
addition collection of VAT on imports was also negatively effected due to the
slow expenditure execution rate on account of the needed adjustment to the new
public procurement regulations
Table 1 Revenue Items with
the largest year-on-year changes
|
Revenue
source |
Change
|
Percentage change
|
|
VAT on non-petroleum imports |
Tsh
25 billion increase |
20
percent increase |
|
VAT on domestic goods |
Tsh
24 billion increase |
20
percent increase |
|
PAYE |
Tsh 24 billion increase |
26
percent increase |
|
Excise
on petroleum |
Tsh
17 billion increase |
20
percent increase |
|
Ministries
and Regions |
Tsh
17 billion increase |
32
percent increase |
|
Corporate
taxes |
Tsh
9 billion increase |
20
percent increase |
|
Fuel levy |
Tsh
7 billion increase |
15
percent increase |
|
|
||
|
Parastatal
dividends |
Tsh
8 billion decrease |
33
percent decrease |
|
Import
duties |
Tsh
7 billion decrease |
7 percent decrease |
|
|
||
|
All
other revenue |
Tsh
9 billion increase |
4
percent increase |
|
|
||
|
Total
Revenue |
Tsh
113 billion increase
|
12
percent increase |
Taxes on Imports
9.
Taxes
on imports consist of VAT on imports, excise and import duty and taxes on
petroleum imports. Cumulative collections from import taxes were 91 percent of
estimates. Figure 4 presents the actual revenue collection by import tax
category vis-à-vis estimates along with a year-on-year comparison.
Figure 4

10.
The
low performance on VAT on non-petroleum imports is entirely due to lower than estimated
government payment of VAT; particularly on imports. This is partly due to slow pace
of government purchases owing to new procurement law, and partly due to
overestimation of the value of vatable imports which the exemption elimination
would impact.
11.
Taxes
on petroleum imports performed at 99 percent of full year estimates and
represent a growth rate of 13 percent year-on-year. The positive performance of
taxes on petroleum products earlier in the fiscal year was somewhat weaker in
the last quarter of the fiscal year, with both VAT and excise performing
slightly less than in the first three quarters.
12.
Cumulatively
excise duty on petroleum products for the fiscal year was 96 percent of
estimates, although when compared to the corresponding period last year, revenue
collection on excise duty on petroleum registered an increase of 15
percent.
13.
Excise
duty collection on imports of non-petroleum products was 74 percent of
estimates this quarter. However, the substantial high performance of previous
quarters showed through in the year to date collections, registering an overall
performance of 154 percent of estimates. High imports of motor vehicles was a
factor in the previous quarters. Collection of import duties improved this
quarter. Import duties were 4 percent higher in the fourth quarter, and performed
at 98 percent of estimates cumulatively.
The cumulative slight shortfall can be explained by the under estimation
of revenue loss due to the tariff band adjustment carried out in July 2001.
Taxes on Domestic Sales
14.
In
the quarter April – June 2002, taxes on domestic sales were 9 percent above estimates,
contributing in a cumulative over performance of 3 percent for the fiscal year.
However, analysis of the individual components of taxes on domestic sales point
towards lower than estimated revenue collection on domestic excise taxes. This
underperformance was however offset by strong revenue collection from VAT on
domestic transactions.
Taxes on Income
15.
Total
income taxes continued to remain very buoyant during the quarter April - June
2002 and exceeded targets by 18 percent. Cumulative income tax collection was
24 percent higher than estimates for 2001/02 and 18 percent higher than income
tax collection for 2000/01. Figure 5 presents the performance of income taxes
for the fiscal year 2001/02 in comparison with the corresponding period last
fiscal year.
16.
Cumulative
PAYE continued to perform exceptionally well though a little less than in
previous quarters. Individual taxes
have shown some growth, of 9 percent over last year, and significantly over performed
estimates by 143 percent. This
performance is however a little less than in previous quarters. Individual income taxes were positively
influenced by higher tax returns by sole proprietor and small businesses.
17.
Cumulative
collection from withholding taxes also continued to exceed targets, on account
of lower than expected loss from abolishing withholding tax on goods and
services for TIN registered taxpayers. Withholding tax on interest, royalties,
management fees and dividends performed significantly better than estimates. Corporate
tax collection improved during the quarter ended June 2002, reaching 110
percent of estimates compared to 91 percent of estimates in the first three
quarters of the fiscal year, bringing the year to-date performance to 95
percent. Compared to the corresponding period last year, corporate taxes have
shown growth of 20 percent.
Figure 5

Non Tax Revenues
18.
Cumulative
non-tax revenue collection was 105 percent of estimates the fiscal year. This over
performance is mainly on account of higher than projected dividends from
parastatal organizations. Non-tax revenue collection by ministries and regions
remained satisfactory.
EXPENDITURE BY CATEGORY
19.
Total
expenditure for the quarter ended June 2002 was Tsh. 412 billion, 6 percent
above estimates, reflecting a catch up in expenditures from the first half of
the fiscal year. Total expenditure for the fiscal year was Tsh. 1,463 billion,
9 percent below the estimates of Tsh. 1,569 billion. Year on year, actual
expenditure for July 2001 – March 2002 increased by 12 percent in comparison
with the same period last year. Annex C presents a quarterly detailed breakdown
of expenditures by category.
20.
Recurrent
expenditures for April – June 2002 were Tsh. 341 billion, which is 12 above
estimates. For the entire fiscal year, actual recurrent expenditure was 91
percent of estimates. Year on year recurrent expenditures were 10 percent
higher. The slightly lower than estimated expenditure for the fiscal year is
explained mainly by shortfall in foreign budget support loans and grants and delays
experienced by spending agencies on account of new procurement procedures, and
certain contingent expenditures that remained below estimates. Figure 6 depicts
the expenditure performance for major expenditure categories.
21.
For
major expenditure categories, as shown in Annex C, actual expenditures have
been broadly in line with estimates, with majority of under spending in
non-priority expenditures. As the commitment control module in the Integrated
Financial Management System (IFMS) was implemented and checks on further arrears
accumulation put in place, the government decided to extend the arrear
clearance exercise, from arrears accumulated between July 1998 to June 2000, to
arrears accumulated till end June 2001. By end-June 2002 the government had
committed adequate funds to clear all verified budgetary arrears.
22.
Development
expenditure for April – June 2002 was Tsh. 71 billion, which is 17 percent below
estimate of Tsh. 86 billion. The cumulative development expenditure for 2001/02
was Tsh. 345 billion, which is 1 percent above estimate of Tsh. 342 billion. The
cumulative over performance in development expenditure is on account of higher
than projected project loans by donor agencies, while project grants registered
at lower than projected levels, mainly on account of capturing development
grant funds in the exchequer.
23.
Total
priority sector expenditure for April - June 2002 was Tsh 67 billion, 12 percent
lower than estimate. This is principally on account of higher than projected inflows
of basket funds from donors, these basket funds are included as social sector
expenditures. During the fiscal year, total priority sector expenditure was
Tsh.248 billion, 3 percent higher than estimate of Tsh. 241 billion. Year on
year actual priority expenditure increased by 47 percent, with highest increase
being in the other social service category which saw an increase of Tsh. 39
billion, mainly from disbursements of basket funds which were previously
recorded under development grants, now being recorded in this expenditure item.
24.
The
cash management system continued to make quarterly cash allocations for
priority sectors based on respective cash flow plans submitted to the Ministry
of Finance. However, actual expenditures for some priority sectors remained
below estimates on account of the delays in procurement by spending agencies
following the enactment of the new Procurement Act of 2001. In addition to
quarterly allocations for priority sectors, preparations of the population
census and HIV/AIDS priority interventions received their quarterly allocations.
Figure 6

25.
Wages
and salaries were below estimates on account of lower recruitment than planned.
Interest payment, transfers to the Tanzania Revenue Authority, and the Capital
Markets and Securities Authority (subventions) remained as per their respective
estimates. Non priority expenditures were below estimates, mainly on account of
the shortfalls in budget support loans and grants and slow expenditure execution
rate on account of the needed adjustment to the new public procurement regulations.
FINANCING BY COMPONENT
26.
Annex
D provides detailed developments in financing while figure 7 presents a summary of financing for
the entire fiscal year. There was significant shortfall in budget support loans
due to non finalisation of trigger conditionalities by end-June 2002. Project
inflows were approximately as per estimates. The shortfall in privatisation
proceeds continued for the whole fiscal year on account of delays in
finalisation of modalities that would allow the government to reduce its
shareholding in previously privatised parastatal enterprises. The shortfall in
foreign programme inflows was cushioned by lower than estimated amortisation of
external debt, mainly due to the debt relief obtained from Paris Club VII which
was over and above that committed at the HIPC Completion Point in November
2001.

Figure 7
27.
For
the fiscal year 2001/02 programme grants were lower than estimated by Tsh 47
billion principally on account of lower than pledged disbursements from the UK,
Ireland and the European Union. Project
grants remained below estimates reflecting a problem in capturing project grant
disbursements through the exchequer. HIPC relief from multilateral financial
institutions for the fiscal year remained in line with estimates. For the
entire fiscal year, there was a shortfall of Tsh. 131 billion in budget support
loans from IDA PSAC I and ADB SAL II. These shortfalls were due to the delays
experienced in finalising the trigger conditionalities of these loans.
28.
Amortisation of debt for the fiscal year was
below estimates principally on account of relief provided to Tanzania by creditors
at the Paris Club VII after the HIPC Completion Point. Estimates included
certain commitments that were written off at the HIPC Completion Point,
representing a financial relief to the budget. This relief has helped cushion
the fiscal impact of lower than estimated programme loans.
29.
Privatisation
proceeds for the fiscal year were estimated at Tsh. 20 billion but no proceeds
were realised for the entire fiscal year. This shortfall was on account of
delays in finalisation of modalities that would allow the government to reduce
its shareholding in previously privatised parastatal enterprises, particularly
Tanzania Telecommunication Company Limited. The fiscal plan for 2001/02 had
envisaged a borrowing of up to Tsh. 34 billion from domestic sources. In contrast
the government increased its deposits by Tsh. 22 billion. However, in
anticipation of programme inflows, the government had authorized budgeted
expenditures for Ministries, Departments and Agencies in the fourth quarter. Expenditure
commitments were made against these authorizations and a number of cheques
written by June 2002 that had not cleared at the Bank of Tanzania by the end of
the fiscal year. This means that the increase in government deposits of Tsh. 22
billion by end-June does not present an accurate picture of government
operations in 2001/02. It is expected that in 2002/03 the commitments made by
end-June 2002 and cheques written in 2001/02 but not cleared at the Bank of
Tanzania, will impact negatively on the government financial position and will
pose a significant challenge to budgetary execution in 2002/03.
30.
Notwithstanding
the shortfalls in foreign budget support loans and grants the cash management
system allowed for fully funding statutory and priority sector activities. Lower
expenditures due to slow procurement process, coupled with strong revenue
performance, meant that lower than estimated foreign inflows did not translate
into domestic borrowing in 2001/02, and the fiscal situation continued to
remain stable.