| Most
of the known history of Tanganyika before 1964 concerns the
coastal area, although the interior has a number of important
prehistoric sites, including the Olduvai Gorge. Trading contacts
between Arabia and the East African coast existed by the 1st
century AD, and there are indications of connections with India.
The coastal trading centres were mainly Arab settlements, and
relations between the Arabs and their African neighbours appear to
have been fairly friendly. After the arrival of the Portuguese in
the late 15th century, the position of the Arabs was gradually
undermined, but the Portuguese made little attempt to penetrate
into the interior. They lost their foothold north of the Ruvuma
River early in the 18th century as a result of an alliance between
the coastal Arabs and the ruler of Muscat on the Arabian
Peninsula. This link remained extremely tenuous, however, until
French interest in the slave trade from the ancient town of Kilwa,
on the Tanganyikan coast, revived the trade in 1776. Attention by
the French also aroused the sultan of Muscat's interest in the
economic possibilities of the East African coast, and a new Omani
governor was appointed at Kilwa. For some time most of the slaves
came from the Kilwa hinterland, and until the 19th century such
contacts as existed between the coast and the interior were due
mainly to African caravans from the interior.
In their constant
search for slaves, Arab traders began to penetrate farther into
the interior, more particularly in the southeast toward Lake Nyasa.
Farther north two merchants from India followed the tribal trade
routes to reach the country of the Nyamwezi about 1825. Along this
route ivory appears to have been as great an attraction as slaves,
and Sa'id bin Sultan himself, after the transfer of his capital
from Muscat to Zanzibar, gave every encouragement to the Arabs to
pursue these trading possibilities. From the Nyamwezi country the
Arabs pressed on to Lake Tanganyika in the early 1840s. Tabora (or
Kazé, as it was then called) and Ujiji, on Lake Tanganyika,
became important trading centres, and a number of Arabs made their
homes there. They did not annex these territories but occasionally
ejected hostile chieftains. Mirambo, an African chief who built
for himself a temporary empire to the west of Tabora in the 1860s
and '70s, effectively blocked the Arab trade routes when they
refused to pay him tribute. His empire was purely a personal one,
however, and collapsed on his death in 1884.
The first Europeans
to show an interest in Tanganyika in the 19th century were
missionaries of the Church Missionary Society, Johann Ludwig Krapf
and Johannes Rebmann, who in the late 1840s reached Kilimanjaro.
It was a fellow missionary, Jakob Erhardt, whose famous
"slug" map (showing, on Arab information, a vast,
shapeless, inland lake) helped stimulate the interest of the
British explorers Richard Burton and John Hanning Speke. They
traveled from Bagamoyo to Lake Tanganyika in 1857-58, and Speke
also saw Lake Victoria. This expedition was followed by Speke's
second journey, in 1860, in the company of J.A. Grant, to justify
the former's claim that the Nile rose in Lake Victoria. These
primarily geographic explorations were followed by the activities
of David Livingstone, who in 1866 set out on his last journey for
Lake Nyasa. Livingstone's object was to expose the horrors of the
slave trade and, by opening up legitimate trade with the interior,
to destroy the slave trade at its roots. Livingstone's journey led
to the later expeditions of H.M. Stanley and V.L. Cameron. Spurred
on by Livingstone's work and example, a number of missionary
societies began to take an interest in East Africa after 1860.
Zanzibar
Portuguese and Omani domination
Africans are known to have inhabited both Zanzibar and Pemba
islands possibly before the birth of Christ. Thus it is possible
that the present African inhabitants of the former Sultanate
consist (i) of the descendants of these ancient natives; (ii)
descendants of the ex-slaves; and (iii) of Africans who have
attained Zanzibar citizenship including the migratory labour force
which comes and goes according to the season. The original African
inhabitants of Zanzibar are believed to have migrated from the
African mainland, probably and initially in search of better
fishing facilities on a seasonal basis. The two ethnic
groups were the Tumbatu, who lived at the outset on the islet of
Tumbatu off the north-west coast of Zanzibar island, and the
Hadimu, who occupied an area on the main island to the south of
the Tumbatu islet.
Later on the
Tumbatu tribe extended their settlements to the main island and
now occupies the northern part of Zanzibar. The Hadimu now occupy
more than 60 per cent of the total acreage of Zanzibar island in
the central-eastern parts and almost all of the region to the
south of the Zanzibar town. The main tribe which settled in Pemba
was one called the Pemba; but a small group of the Tumbatu tribe
also settled in the southern part of the island.
The small and
separate village communities, which these early settlers created
in the islands, formed themselves into monarchies or
chieftainships, each community being, for all practical purposes,
autonomous and independent of each other. A settlement of unknown
size of population was therefore the largest political
organization known to have existed in the early history of these
islands, except perhaps where there was a kind of
"confederacy" of a large number of small neighbouring
settlements. Due to the lack of political unity based on an
inter-tribal organization throughout the islands, the settlers
remained vulnerable to attack and were liable to conquest by
Asiatic and European countries whose nationals travelled from time
to time through the centuries to the East Coast of Africa in
search of trade and adventure.
Early visitors to
Zanzibar and Pemba included Persians, Hindus, Jews, Arabs,
Phoenicians and possibly Assyrrians. Ancient African settlers
therefore had contact with a pot pourri of cultures and managed
not only to survive and absorb some of the newcomers, but also to
adopt many of their political, economic and social methods of
organization. The Africans did not seem to have put up any
resistance to these invaders but they became used to their comings
and goings which were dictated by the seasonal monsoon winds.
Because of the African inherent vulnerability, which was due to
the absence of unity among the various ethnic groups, Arabs were
able to establish a colonial regime in the islands.
But the
establishment by the Muscat Arabs of an Arab colonial state in the
nineteenth century was very recent compared with the time of
arrival and settlement in Zanzibar of Persians. Ancient traders
from Shiraz, then a small town in southern Iran (Persia), began in
about the tenth century A.D. to arrive in Zanzibar in large
numbers and to intermarry with local Bantu people there: the
Tumbatu and the Hadimu. The Shirazis, who are an admixture of
Bantu and Asiatic blood and are often known as the Swahilis, were
the result of this miscegenation; and there emerged the Tumbatu
and Hadimu Shirazis. Muscat Arabs also shared in the creation of
the Swahili people and were an important cultural influence. The
Comoriatis, who form a small ethnic group in Zanzibar, come from
the French islands of Comoro in the Indian Ocean. The last
population breakdown on an ethnic basis was made in l958 and gave
a summary of population figures as follows: Afro/Arab, 279,935;
Asians other than Arabs, 18,334; Europeans. 507; and others, 335.
Arabs alone were about 47,000.
Swahili is the
national language of Zanzibar and about one-third of Swahili words
is said to derive from Arabic. Before independence was achieved in
December 1963, two flags flew over Zanzibar: the red flag of the
ex-Sultan,, and the Union Jack. The latter billowed along with the
former to show who the real boss was. About 97 per cent of
Zanzibar’s population are Moslems but as would be expected in a
place where people of such diverse cultural backgrounds live
together, the remaining three per cent are a pot pourri: Hindus,
Christians, Ismailis, and others.
The history of
Zanzibar was written by the wind. As we have seen, ancient Asiatic
nationals used the monsoons to sail in their dhows to East Africa
where they traded in ivory, slaves, spices, skins and iron.
Gervase Mathew in a recent essay based on considerable research
has said that the Periplus of the Erythrean Sea "is
the earliest surviving description of the coast of East
Africa".
According to
Mathew, and contrary to what others had written about it, the
Periplus is a "Greek commercial handbook of the
late first or early second century". In the Periplus, which
is extant, the author expressed the surprising familiarity which
Arabs at that time already had with East Africa, their
understanding of the language of the natives and intermarriage
with them.
During the seventh to the tenth century some Arabs took advantage
of their established familiarity with East Africa and rather than
simply coming to visit the place, as others had done before them
for several centuries, they actually came and settled there. These
Arabs took refuge in East Africa after having fled their countries
following religious disputes among Arab tribes over whom should be
the rightful Caliph or Successor to Prophet Mohammed. It is
believed that one effect of these religious upheavals was the
flight in around A.D. 950 of al-Hasan bin Ali Sultan of Shiraz who
sailed with his six sons and followers from southern Persia and
established settlements on the East Coast of Africa and islands,
one of which was Zanzibar. With his six sons and equipped with
seven ships, Ali Sultan made his historic voyage to Zenji-bar or
the country of the Blacks and thus marked the beginning of what
became known as the Zenj Empire. It is believed that they founded
seven settlements of which Kilwa Kisiwani (the island of Kilwa,
and not Kilwa Kivinje which was founded much later on the
mainland) was one. One of Ali Sultan’s sons called Au is
"stated to have become the first ruler of Kilwa island in
956"1o. It is also generally believed that Kilwa later
developed into a seat of the Zenj Empire, which lasted until the
first decade of the sixteenth century when the Portuguese
conquered it.
The empire had
consisted of island and coastal settlements or "cities"
of varying sizes, the best known of which were Mozambique, KiIwa
island, Zanzibar, Pemba, Mombasa (Fort Jesus), Malindi, Sofala and
the Lamu Archipelago, the last mentioned consisting of Pate, Manda,
Faza (Ampaza) and Tarkwa islets. Petty Arab sultans or sheikhs and
a very high level of civilization obtained ruled these. As a
result of this civilizing influence which the Arabs brought with
them, Africans came to identify civilization with Arabs. Hence the
Swahili word "ustaarabu", which means
"civilization", and implies that to be civilized one
should be like an Arab. But the Pcrtuguese12, with
their superior and more destructive weapons, wrested from the
Arabs the "mastery" of the Indian Ocean and caused the
disintegration of the Arab political control, thus interrupting,
albeit only temporarily, what was already a flourishing commercial
civilization on the East Coast of Africa.
The menacing
influence of the Portuguese began with the historic voyage of
Vasco da Gama around the Cape of Good Hope to Calicut, India. in
1498. Vasco da Gama did not bother much about conquests nor was he
adequately and well enough equipped even to attempt to conquer any
settlement of appreciable size; and the only main achievement of
his first voyage was the discovery of a new route to India. But in
the course of the journey he saw East Africa and had difficulties
with Arab sultans and merchants especially in Mozambique, Kilwa
island and Mombasa. In 1502, on his second expedition. da Gama was
better equipped, having 20 ships, which was five times more than
the vessels be used in his previous voyage. He was thus ready for
any eventuality should the Arabs repeat their aggression towards
the Portuguese.
On arrival in East
Africa da Gama and Ruy Lourenco Ravasco hurled threats at the
sheikhs of Kilwa, Zanzibar and Brava. They told them that their
settlements would be burned down unless they were willing to
acknowledge the supremacy of King Manoel 114 of Portugal and pay
him a yearly tribute in gold. The sheikis would not heed the
threats, however, and Portuguese attacks, which spread over a wide
area, followed swiftly. By force majeure da Gama subdued Kilwa in
1502 and got the Sultan to agree to pay an annual tribute. Ravasco
did the same with Zanzibar in the following year. The Portuguese
then moved northwards to Mombasa and beyond. In all, Mombasa and
Kilwa experienced the worst treatment from the Portuguese,
presumably because they put up more determined resistance against
them. Both were not only ruthlessly sacked, but also savagely
burned and destroyed. Thus in Mombasa almost every living thing
was destroyed and all who "failed to escape had been killed
and burned. Lamu, Pate, Brava and Oja were the next
targets of Portuguese attack. The two avoided destruction by
capitulating early enough but Oja and Brava defied the attack. The
first declared its allegiance to the ruler of Egypt instead, and
both were "sacked and burnt". Mogadishu was the only
town on the East Coast which seemed to have remained intact,
having been assured of this happy situation by some unusually
unfavourable weather conditions which effectively prevented the
advance of the Portuguese. By about 1510 the Portuguese had
ravaged the entire coast-line south of Mogadishu and could claim
to have established effective political control there and seized
the trade route to the sub-continent of India and beyond.
But the Portuguese
lacked the necessary resources to keep the vast territories they
had captured. Dissension and intrigue soon set in, and were
followed by sabotage and assassinations of Arab quislings whom the
Portuguese had installed as puppet rulers. In 1698, which was the
bicentennial of da Gama’s historic voyage. The Sultan of Muscat
in Oman Seif bin Sultan, who had been feeling increasingly envious
of the Portuguese possessions in East Africa, incited the local
Arabs to fight and they recaptured Mombasa from the Portuguese.
These Arabs. repeated their performance in the following year by
recapturing Kilwa and Pemba. But the Portuguese managed to regain
Mombasa in 1727 only to lose it again, and this time for good, two
years later. The Portuguese expulsion from Kilwa and Pemba in 1699
virtually ended their rule in East Africa north of Mozambique.
Meanwhile the
Muscat Arabs had become virtually the dominant Arab group in East
Africa notably after the earlier expulsion of the Portuguese from
Fort Jesus in 1698. Pemba and Kilwa islands were two of their
earliest strongholds. The Imam or the elected politico-spiritual
leader of Oman then claimed as his territory all the east coast of
Africa north of the Rufiji River and his governors (or liwalis)
were put in charge of all the towns and settlements in the area.
But neither this nor even the Portuguese expulsion from East
Africa meant a tighter control over the East Coast by the Imam or
Sultan of Muscat. At its best his hold on the territory remained
"less than tenuous" and each city "was vassal only
in proportion to the fewness of its cannon or the timidity of the
local sheikhs".’ As seems always to be the case,
the local so-called East African subjects of the Sultan of Muscat
having removed the Portuguese were not prepared to be subjected to
another colonial regime, as harsh and as ruthless in dealing with
them as the Portuguese had been. They took advantage of the
existence of an internal uprising against the Yorubi Sultans of
Oman and by the early 1740s several of the east coast towns,
notably Pate, Malindi, Pemba Kilwa island, Zanzibar and Mafia,
were again showing signs of wanting to seek assistance from the
Portuguese to rid themselves of their Arab masters. Sultan al-Hasan
bin Ibrahim of Kilwa provided the necessary liaison with the
Portuguese in Mozambique and reported to them in 1759 the eruption
of war between Oman and the local Arab sultans in Mombasa and
Pate. The apparent rap-preachment between the Portuguese and their
former political vassals in the east coast culminated in an
abortive Portuguese attempt in 1769 supposedly to
"liberate" the Mazrui governors of Mombasa.
In the meantime the
Yorubi dynasty of Oman (1711-1744) had been overthrown and
replaced by the Omani Busaidi dynasty founded in 1744 by Ahmed bin
Said al Busaidi who died in 1784. It was during his rule that
Mombasa and Pate took the lead in expressing open and violent
hostility against the Muscat Arabs which was soon copied elsewhere
with frequent incidents of murdering the representatives of the
Imam and of refusal to pay taxes to him. But it was not until
after his death, when Oman had somewhat recovered from the effects
of the protracted revolt against it by its Arab possessions in
Asia, that any serious attempt was made to consolidate Oman's
suzerainty over its African territory. Early in 1784 Said bin
Ahmad, who was an unsuccessful claimant to the Omani throne, with
his son Ali travelled in anger to the Zenji-lands and attempted to
carve out a domain for himself. His son Ali subdued Kilwa island
in the following year and soon after, Zanzibar also surrendered to
them.
But the exploits of
Saif bin Ahmad were short-lived. Imam’s forces arrived soon
after, even before the surrender of Zanzibar was quite complete,
and both islands were quickly regained and Ahmad banished to Lamu.
A great deal still remained to be done, however, before the ruler
of Oman could claim to have established an effective political
control over his East African territory. This task was to be
undertaken by the shrewd, tough and indomitable Seyyid Said bin
Sultan (1806-I 856) who succeeded to the Omani throne after
murdering the former Imam, his brother.
With his succession
to the throne, Zanzibar soon emerged as the centre of Omani
commercial operations on the East Coast of Africa and became also
the chief slave trade market. He also directed his energies
towards a final elimination of the nuisance of revolt in East
Africa which had been "tolerated" to some extent by his
predecessors owing to military weaknesses in Oman itself because
of an internal uprising and political instability arising from it.
The hardest nut for
Sultan Seyyid Said to crack was Mombasa with its Mazrui governors.
The Mazrui Arabs who enjoyed a good reputation in Asia as able
leaders and who seemed bent on becoming sovereign rulers
somewhere, first took part in the leadership of Mombasa in 1727
when one of them became a deputy governor of the place. This, it
will be remembered, was the year when the Portuguese regained
Mombasa and then lost it two years later. After some time the
Mazrui family became deeply entrenched in Mombasa with the seizure
of power there by Ali bin Uthman al-Mazrui that by 1753 had also
seized Pemba and unsuccessfully attempted to do the same thing
with Zanzibar. A year after Seyyid Said had become ruler of Oman,
another Mazrui governor, Ahmad bin Said al-Mazrui, extended
political control over Pate and by 1814 he or his supporters had
brought Lamu also under the domain of the Mazrui family. Thus the
Mazrui challenge to the suzerainty of Seyyid Said on the East
Coast of Africa became a factor which had to be reckoned with.
But Said was not in
a position to do anything about this Mazrui defiance until the
second decade of the nineteenth century since he had not yet
consolidated his control over Oman itself. In 1822 Said dispatched
Hamid bin Ahmad, who was his relative, to Zenji-bar and, within a
short time Pate, Brava and Lamu were subjected to Oman. Omani
efforts to inflict an early defeat upon the Mazrui in Mombasa were
frustrated by some mix-up in which the British were involved; but
in 1826 the British had withdrawn from there, and in the following
year the Mazrui surrendered. They rebelled again shortly
afterwards, however, when Said sailed back to Oman to try to quell
a revolt there and it was not until about 1840 that the Mazrui
were finally overcome. Said thus became the undisputed ruler of
the entire East Coast of Africa north of Mozambique.
Meanwhile in 1832
Said had moved his palace to Zanzibar the better to be able, even
before Mombasa capitulated, to tighten his control over a large
section of East Africa. That is how modern Zanzibar was created.
In addition to being the gateway to East and Central Africa in the
"pre-scramble for Africa" period, Zanzibar was also
important for the role which its rulers played, albeit often by
yielding to force majeure, in supporting efforts, mainly by the
British, aimed at getting at the main sources and routes of the
slave trade and ensuring its early abolition. By 1822 Sayyid Said
had agreed to sign the Moresby Treaty which was to make
"illegal", throughout his dominions, the "sale of
slaves to subjects of Christian powers He also agreed to limit the
slave traffic to ports in his African and Oman dominions. To
confirm the Moresby Treaty and other existing trading regulations,
the U.S. (1836) and Britain (1840) established diplomatic
relations with Zanzibar and posted their consuls there. France
also posted a consul. Zanzibar was thus the first territory in
tropical Africa to enjoy such relations. In 1845 the Hamerton
Treaty further restricted the slave trade to his East African
dominions. This was a significant step for two main reasons:
first, it tightened the noose around the neck of the East African
slave trade; and second, it triggered bitter resentment and anger
among the subjects of His Highness the Sultan. Muscat’s loss in
revenue resulting from it was believed to be considerable, and it
is generally accepted that this was one reason why Muscat pressed
later for a separate sultan of its own. It is interesting to note
that when a dispute about succession arose it was referred to Lord
Charles Canning, then governor-general of India, for arbitration.
He decided on 2 April 1861, that the late Sultan’s two sons (Thuwain
and Majid) should divide their father’s possessions. Thuwain
became the Sultan of Muscat and Oman and Majid of Zanzibar. Lord
Canning further "pronounced the independence of Zanzibar,
as part of the settlement. A year later Great Britain,
Germany and France, in a joint multi-lateral declaration,
recognized this independence. The recognition gave some
international status to the Sultan’s claims over the mainland,
but in 1886, as documented by the Delimitation Treaty, Great
Britain and Germany violated the integrity of his territories.
They, however, recognized his sovereignty over Zanzibar.
Earlier, stories
told by such explorers as David Livingstone had ineffectiveness of
the Hamerton Treaty of 1845 as slaves were still trafficked beyond
the Sultan’s realm. For instance between 1867 and 1869,
notwithstanding the determined efforts of British naval patrols,
about "37,000 slaves were successfully smuggled overseas Sir
Bartle Frere, a former governor of Bombay, headed a parliamentary
committee which went to Zanzibar in January 1873 to persuade the
Sultan to end the slave trade in his dominions. But Sultan
Barghash, who had succeeded Majid in 1870, opposed the abolition
of the slave trade. It was only after threats from the British
Consul General, Sir John Kirk, that Barghash signed the treaty on
5 June 1873. This treaty made the slave trade illegal and the
gates of the slave market were closed forthwith and forever. To
commemorate this momentous emergence from darkness and inhumanity,
the foundation stone of the Protestant Cathedral was
laid on the same site shortly after, in 1873. Despite these
favourable developments, the deeply entrenched institution of
slavery did not yet seem to have been finally shaken. To be sure,
the slave trade was illegal; but the legal status of slavery was
not abolished in Zanzibar until 1897; the same objective was
realized in Kenya in 1904. In Tanganyika it was not until the
country had become a British mandated territory in 1919 that
slavery was finally abolished.
Reference has
already been made to the Delimitation Treaty signed by Germany and
Great Britain between 29 October and 1 November 1886. The
signatories had taken this step in an attempt to settle
conflicting territorial claims over parts of East Africa. But they
had done this without the Sultan being consulted. After this
amputation of his dominions the Sultan retained sovereignty only
over the islands of Zanzibar, Pemba, Mafia, and Lamu plus a 16
kilometre (ten mile) coastal strip, stretching from the Tana River
in the north to the Ruvuma in the south. Britain and Germany
divided between themselves the hinterland beyond the sixteen-kilometre
limit by a line drawn from the Umba river westward to Lake
Victoria and thus fixed the present boundary between Kenya and
Tanganyika.
Barghash, as well
as the Portuguese, reacted sharply to the Anglo-German agreement.
Barghash sent cables of protest to London and Berlin requesting
that he be given at least six months to consider the treaty. But
this was not granted and he was forced to sign the treaty on 7
December 1886. He died in March 1888.
Humiliating losses of territory of this kind continued and Sultan
Khalifa bin Said, who succeeded Barghash, also bowed to the
inevitable, receiving £200,000 sterling from the Germans in
exchange for the "Tanganyika" portion of the Littoral.
The Imperial British East Africa Company, formed in 1885 to
contest claims over parts of Tanganyika made by Dr. Carl Peters of
Germany, was then busy reorganizing and was chartered by the Crown
in September 1888, as the East Africa Company under the leadership
of Sir William Mackinnon. The company operated in the Sultan’s
coastal strip in exchange for payment of an annuity of £1 1,0(0
sterling. As the Empire builders increased their drive for the
acquisition of territories in Africa, the further erosion both of
Zanzibar’s independence and the Sultan’s sovereignty could
hardly be avoided. In 1890 Germany and Britain signed the treaty
of Heligoland by which they made a ‘‘swap" enabling the
former to acquire Heligoland in exchange for her recognition of
the latter’s protection over Zanzibar. The Kaiser, William II,
unlike Bismarck who had just fallen, valued Heligoland, which is
off the North German Coast, more than Zanzibar, because he needed
the former in order to establish a naval base there. Uganda was
also to be drawn within the British "sphere of
influence" at a later date. |